Why an applicant might fail an OSCE
On average, 60% of applicants are successful at the first attempt, while 70% of applicants who undertake the second attempt are successful.
The failure rate needs to be viewed against the backdrop that the OSCEs are based on the NMBI standards and requirements for Irish-trained general student nurses. Therefore, the OSCEs reflect what an RGN working as first year staff nurse in a general hospital (or comparable) would be expected to know and do in a safe and competent manner.
As applicants are already trained as general nurses in their own country, an exploration as to why some are failing might be useful for prospective employers, recruitment agencies and future applicants.
Notwithstanding that a certain level of examination anxiety is normal, the following observations are offered as mere suggestions as to possible factors that may be contributing to some applicants failing.
-
Lack of preparation: Some applicants appear to be ill-prepared for the test. A test generally opens 3.5 months in advance. Each applicant should assess how much preparation is essential for them. This should be factored into account if applying for an earlier test date. As a starting point in preparing for the test, applicants are strongly advised to be fully familiar with the most recent information on this website including all links and to be aware that additional reference material is frequently added. It is recommended that applicants practise filling in the documentation that may be used at the OSCEs.
- Rote learning: Preparation for any examination is vital. However, nursing is not just about knowledge but it is also about the application of that knowledge to ensure safe delivery of patient care. It would appear that some applicants are rote-learning different aspects but not able to apply the knowledge. Applicants must be prepared for changes in scenarios and for safe application of knowledge that may not be required in the linear fashion in which a topic was rote-learnt. Over the past two years we have noticed an increase in the numbers failing coupled with an increase in the number of stations being failed. In some instances, the same incorrect information is being given by a number of applicants. It would seem as if a number of applicants have acquired a large amount of information but without understanding it. Consequently, they cannot apply the information; or they give the information at a station that is not relevant to that station but to a completely different station; or if they are asked to explain what they are saying they just continue with the learnt script. In a number of situations, the information acquired is not that on the webpage. Since the first test in December 2015, the regulated standard, rigour, validity and reliability of the OSCEs has remained consistent.
- Expectation: Some applicants present for an OSCE anticipating/expecting a specific scenario and may experience difficulty when presented with a different scenario. Of late we have noticed a significant increase in applicants coming into a station expecting one scenario and if it has changed some find it difficult to adjust. Even though they have been reading the scenario outside the station some still answer what they were expecting, which may be different. Please remember that the OSCEs are based on what is expected of a newly-qualified RGN who will meet different patients on a daily basis. There is a large bank of OSCEs and new OSCEs are added several times per year. Therefore, OSCEs will change from test to test. Applicants should note that nobody can accurately anticipate what OSCEs will be part of a test. If an applicant is advised/guided to expect specific scenarios at OSCE stations then they are being misguided.
- Not heeding: The scenario/s pertaining to an OSCE station are displayed outside the station. However, it would appear some applicants do not take sufficient care in reading these They then go into the station with what they believed was coming up and not what was on the descriptor that they had access to before going into a station. On the day of the OSCEs we advise applicants to avoid getting distracted and read the station descriptor in a focused way.
- Relevant experience: It would appear that some applicants, although qualified for a number of years, may not have had recent relevant experience in a general hospital. Obviously, this is not the business of RCSI, but might be something prospective employers/recruitment agencies may wish to explore.
- Differences between countries: There will always be some differences between countries in regard to equipment and documentation. Images of equipment and documentation are clearly shown on the website – it would appear some applicants do not take care when studying the images of the equipment or practise filling in the documentation, both of which are crucial.
In conclusion, the majority of applicants prepare well, are able to apply knowledge in a safe way and give full care and attention throughout the test (although the % is less than it was). However, the above observations may assist others.
Please note: Remember that RCSI does not endorse or approve any training or preparation course for the test.
